Page 6 of 6

Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 20:02
by Syringe
It's too bad i'm closer to 15.

Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 20:56
by OBrocks
iamthelordhitman wrote:its tied :|
But paranoia's no vote doesnt count

Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 21:43
by Catherine
Jet Andre wrote:We need an older more mature mod, like say chaps age. A thirteen year old as a mod would be BLASPHEMY!
Well we don't really need any more mods anyway.

Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 21:45
by Darth Urra
Catherine wrote:
Jet Andre wrote:We need an older more mature mod, like say chaps age. A thirteen year old as a mod would be BLASPHEMY!
Well we don't really need any more mods anyway.
[/thread]

Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 00:04
by Syringe
Catherine wrote:
Jet Andre wrote:We need an older more mature mod, like say chaps age. A thirteen year old as a mod would be BLASPHEMY!
Well we don't really need any more mods anyway.
[/fail] is more like it. The modding is lacking in an overall sense. Spam is rampant.

You said it yourself, Cat. Annoying and boring.

Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 00:45
by iamthelordhitman
VengeanceOfNight wrote:
Catherine wrote:
Jet Andre wrote:We need an older more mature mod, like say chaps age. A thirteen year old as a mod would be BLASPHEMY!
Well we don't really need any more mods anyway.
[/fail] is more like it. The modding is lacking in an overall sense. Spam is rampant.

You said it yourself, Cat. Annoying and boring.

and some of it is contributued by yourself at times.

its getting better, but still.

Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 00:46
by Syringe
Indeed it is.

If you can't beat them (as I have no power to do so), join them.

Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 01:50
by iamthelordhitman
you do realize by joining them you reduce your chances of ever becoming a full mod right :|

Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 02:32
by Syringe
Sure, but i'd reeeeeally love to beat them as opposed to the latter.

Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 07:39
by Ransom
VengeanceOfNight wrote:The modding is lacking in an overall sense. Spam is rampant.

You said it yourself, Cat. Annoying and boring.
Yeah that has nothing to do with moderation. It is not a moderator's job to make a forum interesting. Content is dependent on all users.

Spam, though? We could certainly go police-state on you guys if you only want to see sensible, purposeful threads. Honestly I have rarely seen things get to the stage where significant moderation is necessary, but maybe my tolerance for these things is more lenient than it should be.

Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 11:19
by samuelmonaghan_aussie
Jet Andre wrote:Achilies IMO would be the best candidate.
yea

i voted yes to poll but i think achillies should be a mod too

Re: VoN for full mod

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 16:23
by Gordon Frohman
lmao I was like